🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.